Skip to content

ums: 6.2.2 -> 9.1.0 #77957

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2020
Merged

ums: 6.2.2 -> 9.1.0 #77957

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2020
+7 −3

Conversation

snicket2100
Copy link
Contributor

@snicket2100 snicket2100 commented Jan 17, 2020 •
edited
Loading

An upgrade.

Notes:

Removing the packaged JRE so that jre8 gets used.

Patchelf fails on tsMuxeR and tsMuxeR-new, but this doesn't make it any worse comparing to 6.2.2 where is also failed, so I am assuming fixing it is out of scope of this pr. The only difference is that the new UMS version correctly identifies that tsMuxeR doesn't work, comparing to the previous one.

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@snicket2100
ums: 6.2.2 -> 9.1.0
efe3859 
Removing the packaged JRE so that `jre8` gets used.

Patchelf fails on `tsMuxeR` and `tsMuxeR-new`, but this doesn't make
it any worse comparing to 6.2.2 where is also failed, so I am assuming
fixing it is out of scope of this pr. The only difference is that the
new UMS version correctly identifies that `tsMuxeR` doesn't work,
comparing to the previous one.
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Jan 17, 2020
@alyssais alyssais merged commit 7893853 into NixOS:master Mar 13, 2020
@snicket2100 snicket2100 deleted the ums910 branch May 6, 2020 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@snicket2100 @alyssais