New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pythonPackages.docloud: init at 1.0.375 #78874
Conversation
2c07bdc
to
9d39afa
Compare
The IBM Decision Optimization on Cloud Python client. Requirement of docplex, which is a dependency of qiskit-aqua.
9d39afa
to
71ec410
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not going to lie, this package is "smelly":
- versioning looks like incremental releases
- no tests
I guess the dependency list is small and stable. But I'm not really convinced this belongs in nixpkgs.
Looking at the example for qiskit (which is the end goal), it's meant to be consumed as an sdk, which means it will have to play well with the rest of t he python-ecosystem.
My main concern is that the nixpkgs python ecosystem (which has a pretty fast and steady cadence), may make this really fragile (E.g, one of the new 27 dependencies is broken, now it's broken too).
If you're willing to be active and maintain these package set I'll be cooperative in getting it in, but generally it's the case that the core contributors take the lion share of having to maintain these packages.
For example, the google package set right now has namespace issues so it's horribly broken at the moment. But I don't have the time or cares to fix it, and the original maintainer is longer able to be found.
Fair. Thanks for your help with this whole process. It looks like the qiskit-aqua package will be broken then without the qiskit-aqua -> docplex -> docloud dependency, as the docplex dependency is pretty deep, e.g. covered in the README. ising/docplex.py and test_readme_sample.py. If I can't get the entire |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
diff LGTM (would still like tests)
trusting @drewrisinger to help maintain these packages :)
[5 built, 0.0 MiB DL]
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/78874
3 package built:
python27Packages.docloud python37Packages.docloud python38Packages.docloud
Motivation for this change
Add sub-dependency for upcoming package qiskit-aqua #78772 @jonringer
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)