Icecream support #84324
Icecream support #84324
Conversation
Emantor
force-pushed
the
init/icecc_icemon
branch
from
9f5ae63 to
39ae6f6
Compare
ofborg
bot
added
6.topic: nixos
| type = types.path; | ||
| default = "/var/tmp/icecc-daemon"; | ||
| description = '' | ||
| Maximum size in Megabytes of cache used to store compile environments of compile clients. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It does not look like the right description.
Does this path really need to be customizable ? For example I expect the command will break if this contains spaces.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I need to fix the description. Reasoning behind this was to give the user the ability to put this on a different partition, I'd be fine with removing this too. The compile environments stored there can get quite large, but size can be restricted as well. IDK, open to options.
Does this path really need to be customizable ? For example I expect the command will break if this contains spaces.
Hm, the type = types.path is not enough for that? It needs extra escaping?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is no automatic escaping, as escaping rules are not the same for all software.
Reasoning behind this was to give the user the ability to put this on a different partition
On NixOS it is not much harder to define a bind mount of the partition you want to use on /var/run/icecc-daemon.
Anyway, you know the software better than me, so up to you.
Emantor
force-pushed
the
init/icecc_icemon
branch
from
39ae6f6 to
08536d7
Compare
|
Hello, I'm a bot and I thank you in the name of the community for your contributions. Nixpkgs is a busy repository, and unfortunately sometimes PRs get left behind for too long. Nevertheless, we'd like to help committers reach the PRs that are still important. This PR has had no activity for 180 days, and so I marked it as stale, but you can rest assured it will never be closed by a non-human. If this is still important to you and you'd like to remove the stale label, we ask that you leave a comment. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". But there's a bit more you can do: If you received an approval by an unprivileged maintainer and you are just waiting for a merge, you can @ mention someone with merge permissions and ask them to help. You might be able to find someone relevant by using Git blame on the relevant files, or via GitHub's web interface. You can see if someone's a member of the nixpkgs-committers team, by hovering with the mouse over their username on the web interface, or by searching them directly on the list. If your PR wasn't reviewed at all, it might help to find someone who's perhaps a user of the package or module you are changing, or alternatively, ask once more for a review by the maintainer of the package/module this is about. If you don't know any, you can use Git blame on the relevant files, or GitHub's web interface to find someone who touched the relevant files in the past. If your PR has had reviews and nevertheless got stale, make sure you've responded to all of the reviewer's requests / questions. Usually when PR authors show responsibility and dedication, reviewers (privileged or not) show dedication as well. If you've pushed a change, it's possible the reviewer wasn't notified about your push via email, so you can always officially request them for a review, or just @ mention them and say you've addressed their comments. Lastly, you can always ask for help at our Discourse Forum, or more specifically, at this thread or at #nixos' IRC channel. |
stale
bot
added
the
2.status: stale
|
I'd like to remove the stale label. I am currently carrying this forward and can rebase onto the master branch quickly, however it is still unclear who needs to review this change. |
stale
bot
removed
the
2.status: stale
ryantm
added
2.status: merge conflict
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PR looks fine to me. There are a few minor issues, but aside from that I recommend rebase and merge. I'll be happy to do so once the PR is in a ready state.
Thanks for your hard work, and your patience. Sometimes things just slip by. Sometimes it can help if you make noise on IRC or discourse.
Emantor
force-pushed
the
init/icecc_icemon
branch
from
08536d7 to
cb9e9a4
Compare
Emantor
force-pushed
the
init/icecc_icemon
branch
from
cb9e9a4 to
3a57f59
Compare
|
Thanks very much for the review @aanderse. The push should address all review comments and this should be good to go from my side. |
ofborg
bot
added
11.by: package-maintainer
Emantor
force-pushed
the
init/icecc_icemon
branch
from
3a57f59 to
177c174
Compare
|
Thanks for the review @infinisil, I have force pushed another version which should address the review comments. |
|
@infinisil gentle ping |
Emantor
force-pushed
the
init/icecc_icemon
branch
from
177c174 to
b1167ec
Compare
This adds modules for the icecream scheduler and daemon. Icecream can be used for distributed compilation, especially in environments with diverse toolchains, since it sends the complete build environment to the daemon. Unfortunatley the daemon can't be run with DynamicUser = true, since the daemon requires to be started as root in order to accept other build environments, see [1]. [1]: https://github.com/icecc/icecream#using-icecream-in-heterogeneous-environments
Emantor
force-pushed
the
init/icecc_icemon
branch
from
b1167ec to
733181d
Compare
|
@infinisil gentle ping |
|
@infinisil gentle ping |
Motivation for this change
Icecream allows distributed compilation in an heterogeneous environment.
This adds the main icecream package and the QT5 based monitor, as well as two new NixOS modules to configure scheduler and daemon. Unfortunately I had to create a new uid for the icecream daemon, since the acceptance of other compile environments hinges on the daemon running as root, which will drop its privileges and switch to the "icecc" user, see here.
I tested this by enabling the module on the desktop and using a debian VM with ptxdist, enabling icecc in the options and using DistroKit as the BSP. A compilation of the armv7a kernel was correctly distributed to both computers running icecream.
Things done
sandboxinnix.confon non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"./result/bin/)nix path-info -Sbefore and after)