Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Merge pull request #78238 from mrVanDalo/bitwig-3.1.2 #78238

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 22, 2020
Merged

Merge pull request #78238 from mrVanDalo/bitwig-3.1.2 #78238

merged 1 commit into from Jan 22, 2020

Conversation

mrVanDalo
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation for this change

version bump

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from michalrus January 22, 2020 05:24
@Mic92 Mic92 changed the title bitwig-studio3: 3.1.1 -> 3.1.2 Merge pull request #78238 from mrVanDalo/bitwig-3.1.2 Jan 22, 2020
@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 79c4c48 into NixOS:master Jan 22, 2020
@mrVanDalo mrVanDalo deleted the bitwig-3.1.2 branch January 22, 2020 09:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@michalrus michalrus Awaiting requested review from michalrus

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 11.by: package-maintainer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@mrVanDalo @Mic92