Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

telepresence: 0.101 -> 0.104 #79216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 9, 2020
Merged

telepresence: 0.101 -> 0.104 #79216

merged 1 commit into from Feb 9, 2020

Conversation

tomoyat1
Copy link
Contributor

@tomoyat1 tomoyat1 commented Feb 4, 2020 •
edited

Motivation for this change

Bump telepresence to 0.104, which contains bug fixes.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@tomoyat1
telepresence: 0.101 -> 0.104
71d4420 
Bump telepresence to 0.104, which contains bug fixes.
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from offlinehacker February 4, 2020 12:18
@nlewo nlewo merged commit 1991c62 into NixOS:master Feb 9, 2020
@tomoyat1 tomoyat1 deleted the telepresence-0.104 branch February 10, 2020 10:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@offlinehacker offlinehacker Awaiting requested review from offlinehacker

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 12. first-time contribution
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@tomoyat1 @nlewo @Janik-Haag