Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vscode: Added libdbusmenu support #79889

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

brcha
Copy link
Contributor

@brcha brcha commented Feb 12, 2020

Motivation for this change

I wanted to enable global menus (appmenus, unity menus, dbusmenus, …) for VSCode and VSCodium. It's worth mentioning the issue: #65680

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

As can be seen on the following screenshot, I've built the VSCode package and it now works with DBusMenus as it should. The only thing I did was to add libdbusmenu-gtk3 to dependencies in several places in the file. I've also tried to honor the Darwin target by adding libdbusmenu-gtk3 only where it didn't apply to Darwin, but, since I don't have a Mac to test this change, nor am I overly versed in Nix{,OS,Pkgs,…} ecosystem, I implore you to check that before accepting this push request. I'm guessing libdbusmenu doesn't work in Mac to provide global menus, but perhaps I'm wrong about that.

Screenshot_20200212_042855

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from eadwu February 12, 2020 18:15
@peterhoeg
Copy link
Member

@brcha any chance you can fix up the merge conflict so we can get this merged?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 7, 2021

I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Apr 7, 2021
@pasqui23
Copy link
Contributor

pasqui23 commented Apr 7, 2021

still nedded to be merged

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

@brcha @pasqui23 can't be with a merge conflict.

@stale stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jun 26, 2021
@pasqui23
Copy link
Contributor

@SuperSandro2000 Cow can we check where in the file is the merge conflict?

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

@SuperSandro2000 Cow can we check where in the file is the merge conflict?

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/79889/conflicts

@pasqui23
Copy link
Contributor

@SuperSandro2000 Cow can we check where in the file is the merge conflict?

#79889 (conflicts)

The link you gave gives me 404

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Still WOM. Click on the resolve conflict button at the bottom of the PR to see the merge conflict.

@pasqui23
Copy link
Contributor

image
Can github show merge conflicts without write privileges?

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Then that button only shows if you can commit things I guess. Please rebase it locally.
image

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 6, 2022

I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jan 6, 2022
@Artturin
Copy link
Member

is this required since 0d3136a ?

@Artturin Artturin closed this Apr 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.status: merge conflict 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants