Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

treewide: batched rust cargoSha256 upgrades #80265

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

bhipple
Copy link
Contributor

@bhipple bhipple commented Feb 16, 2020

This batches together a handful of relatively straightforward upgrades. Since
there's a lot of compilation and fixed-output merge conflict risk, I think this
is too big to build and test in one huge treewide PR, but also want to be
conscientious about not spamming the PR inbox for NixPkgs by sending them all
1-by-1. Let me know what you'd prefer.

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
@bhipple
Copy link
Contributor Author

bhipple commented Feb 16, 2020

Eh, not a big fan of this approach; aside from it going into conflict (which it now has), and causing a lot of rebuilds all at once for something that's fine being an incremental gradual upgrade, there's a bystander effect on testing/approving/merging when it's a big pile of packages. I think I'll stick to individual PRs that are more digestible, unless you prefer otherwise @jonringer.

@bhipple bhipple closed this Feb 16, 2020
@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

individual is fine by me. It does make the build times a lot shorter

plus, rustc take an ungodly amount of RAM to build stuff. I go from ~2Gb used, to 30Gb+ used when kicking off many rust projects

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants