Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

nixpkgs-fmt: upgrade cargo fetcher and cargoSha256 #80299

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 17, 2020
Merged

nixpkgs-fmt: upgrade cargo fetcher and cargoSha256 #80299

merged 1 commit into from Feb 17, 2020

Conversation

bhipple
Copy link
Contributor

@bhipple bhipple commented Feb 16, 2020

Infra upgrade as part of #79975; no functional change expected.

@bhipple
nixpkgs-fmt: upgrade cargo fetcher and cargoSha256
36cf8ad 
Infra upgrade as part of NixOS#79975; no functional change expected.
@bhipple
Copy link
Contributor Author

bhipple commented Feb 16, 2020

@GrahamcOfBorg build nixpkgs-fmt

@evanjs
Copy link
Member

evanjs commented Feb 16, 2020

Under the directory produced by nix-review pr 80299 --eval ofborg:
time "fd --extension nix --exec nixpkgs-fmt"

real	0m6.313s
user	0m32.337s
sys	0m16.287s

😲
Seems to work fine, thanks!

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from zimbatm February 16, 2020 21:50
marsam added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2020
@marsam
Merge pull request #80299 from bhipple/u/rust-cargo-nixpkgs-fmt
f0c9980 
nixpkgs-fmt: upgrade cargo fetcher and cargoSha256
@marsam marsam merged commit f0c9980 into NixOS:master Feb 17, 2020
@marsam marsam merged commit 36cf8ad into NixOS:master Feb 17, 2020
@bhipple bhipple deleted the u/rust-cargo-nixpkgs-fmt branch June 2, 2020 22:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@zimbatm zimbatm Awaiting requested review from zimbatm

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@bhipple @evanjs @marsam