Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pythonPackages.ansible-runner: skip failing test on Catalina #80484

Merged

Conversation

kalbasit
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

Catalina replaced the director /home with a symbolic link to /System/Volumes/Data/home and this test is looking for /home explicitly.

I filed ansible/ansible-runner#413 to get this fix upstream.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Catalina replaced the director /home with a symbolic link to
/System/Volumes/Data/home and this test is looking for /home
explicitly.

I filed ansible/ansible-runner#413 to get this fix upstream.
Co-Authored-By: Jon <jonringer@users.noreply.github.com>
@kalbasit
Copy link
Member Author

It seems to work fine! I'm planning to squash-merge the pr so no need to rebase commits.

@GrahamcOfBorg build python2Packages.ansible-runner python3Packages.ansible-runner

@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

otherwise LGTM

@kalbasit kalbasit merged commit f84bc72 into NixOS:master Feb 19, 2020
@kalbasit kalbasit deleted the nixpkgs_fix-python-ansible-runner-on-darwin branch February 19, 2020 03:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants