Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

glibc: 2.32-25 -> 2.32-35 #109125

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 22, 2021
Merged

glibc: 2.32-25 -> 2.32-35 #109125

merged 1 commit into from Jan 22, 2021

Conversation

TredwellGit
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/release/2.32/master

Things done

@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

@GrahamcOfBorg python3Packages.requests

Copy link
Contributor

@jonringer jonringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

diff LGTM assuming ofborg passes

@TredwellGit
Copy link
Member Author

If someone merges this, then merge #109261 as well since they both require rebuilding stdenv.

@TredwellGit TredwellGit changed the title glibc: 2.32-25 -> 2.32-27 glibc: 2.32-25 -> 2.32-28 Jan 13, 2021
@TredwellGit TredwellGit changed the title glibc: 2.32-25 -> 2.32-28 glibc: 2.32-25 -> 2.32-29 Jan 13, 2021
@TredwellGit
Copy link
Member Author

@GrahamcOfBorg build python3Packages.requests

@TredwellGit TredwellGit changed the title glibc: 2.32-25 -> 2.32-29 glibc: 2.32-25 -> 2.32-34 Jan 21, 2021
@TredwellGit
Copy link
Member Author

@GrahamcOfBorg build python3Packages.requests

@TredwellGit TredwellGit changed the title glibc: 2.32-25 -> 2.32-34 glibc: 2.32-25 -> 2.32-35 Jan 21, 2021
@TredwellGit
Copy link
Member Author

@GrahamcOfBorg build python3Packages.requests

@FRidh FRidh merged commit 733b533 into NixOS:staging Jan 22, 2021
@TredwellGit TredwellGit deleted the glibc branch January 22, 2021 22:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants