-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.5k
libexosip: 4.1.0 -> 5.2.0 #110231
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
libexosip: 4.1.0 -> 5.2.0 #110231
Conversation
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch). Result of 1 package failed to build and are new build failure:
3 packages built:
Either update sipwitch, too or try to find a patch. |
Sorry I missed that, I do not have I'm not sure what to do here. The breaking change in the API of libexosip ( |
Oh, sorry I had allow insecure still on from texting earlier. I think it would be safe to mark the insecure package broken and then merge this PR. |
e69b4a1
to
d7aefde
Compare
@LeSuisse please fix the merge conflict. |
Fix CVE-2014-10375. sipwitch is marked as broken as it does compile with libexosip > 5.0.0 and the upstream project appears to be stalled/abandoned.
d7aefde
to
fdafac8
Compare
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch). Result of 1 package marked as broken and skipped:
3 packages built:
|
Motivation for this change
Fix CVE-2014-10375.
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)