Skip to content

Fix fcitx5 #109649

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 19, 2021
Merged

Fix fcitx5 #109649

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 19, 2021

Conversation

berberman
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

Closes #109631

This PR fixes two bugs in fcitx5 packaging:

  • libfcitx5platforminputcontextplugin.so was not captured, resulting in missing input method module for Qt5
  • .desktop files pointed to unwrapped executables before symlinkJoin, leading to failure of addons
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

cc @poscat0x04

Sorry, something went wrong.

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from poscat0x04 January 17, 2021 17:22
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Jan 17, 2021
@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch).
If you have any questions or problems please reach out to SuperSandro2000 on IRC.

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 109649 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package failed to build and are new build failure:
5 packages built:
  • fcitx5-configtool
  • fcitx5-with-addons
  • libsForQt5.fcitx5-qt (libsForQt515.fcitx5-qt)
  • libsForQt512.fcitx5-qt
  • libsForQt514.fcitx5-qt

Copy link
Contributor

@poscat0x04 poscat0x04 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from poscat0x04 January 18, 2021 02:30
@berberman
Copy link
Member Author

1 package failed to build and are new build failure:

@SuperSandro2000 I could not reproduce this error on my machine.

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch).
If you have any questions or problems please reach out to SuperSandro2000 on IRC.

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 109649 run on x86_64-linux 1

6 packages built:
  • fcitx5-chinese-addons
  • fcitx5-configtool
  • fcitx5-with-addons
  • libsForQt5.fcitx5-qt (libsForQt515.fcitx5-qt)
  • libsForQt512.fcitx5-qt
  • libsForQt514.fcitx5-qt

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Please remove the master merge commit. Then we can merge this.

berberman and others added 4 commits January 19, 2021 19:30

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
berberman Potato Hatsue

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
berberman Potato Hatsue

Partially verified

This commit is signed with the committer’s verified signature.
berberman’s contribution has been verified via GPG key.
We cannot verify signatures from co-authors, and some of the co-authors attributed to this commit require their commits to be signed.
Co-authored-by: Sandro <sandro.jaeckel@gmail.com>

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
berberman Potato Hatsue
@berberman
Copy link
Member Author

ping @SuperSandro2000

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

@ofborg eval

@ofborg ofborg bot added the ofborg-internal-error Ofborg encountered an error label Jan 19, 2021
@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

@ofborg eval

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 removed the ofborg-internal-error Ofborg encountered an error label Jan 19, 2021
@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch).
If you have any questions or problems please reach out to SuperSandro2000 on IRC.

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 109649 run on x86_64-linux 1

6 packages built:
  • fcitx5-chinese-addons
  • fcitx5-configtool
  • fcitx5-with-addons
  • libsForQt5.fcitx5-qt (libsForQt515.fcitx5-qt ,plasma5Packages.fcitx5-qt)
  • libsForQt512.fcitx5-qt
  • libsForQt514.fcitx5-qt

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit 337b3f9 into NixOS:master Jan 19, 2021
@berberman berberman deleted the fix-fcitx5 branch January 19, 2021 17:35
@Janik-Haag Janik-Haag added the 12. first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle! label Jun 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 12. first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fctix5 does not work in qt programs
4 participants