Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust orbit analyser terminology #2886

Merged
merged 26 commits into from Feb 8, 2021

Conversation

eggrobin
Copy link
Member

@eggrobin eggrobin commented Feb 7, 2021

  • Corrected some English terms: remove mentions of sub- and supersynchronous which do not mean what I think they did, and reword the mean altitudes of the apsides.

  • Miscellaneous bibliography fixes.

  • Adjusted many Chinese technical terms in accordance with the literature; cite the relevant literature. In particular, all three periods and
    almost all of the ground track analysis section is affected (highlighted below).

    image

    There remain issues in the analyser: the mission duration label does not fit, the string (precesses) is untranslated, etc. These will be addressed in a future pull request.

  • Tweaked the structure of the analyser a bit, grouping the recurrence and equatorial crossing longitude sections under a Ground track heading:

Old New
image image

@@ -675,6 +675,21 @@ @article{LaineyDuriezVienne2004
volume = {420},
}

@article{LǐLǐLǐ2012,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please order the fields properly, look at the other @article clauses for the right order. I do want to have to make a pass on the bibliography to clean it up.

@@ -851,6 +866,21 @@ @article{Overholt1965
volume = {5},
}

@article{QūZhāngJīn2008,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After Quinlan....

eprint = {HTHJ201204009},
}


@article{WilkinsGu2013,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The order seems messed up around here. This should move up,

@@ -990,6 +1051,23 @@ @article{Yoshida1990
volume = {150},
}

@article{ZhōuLǐXìnWéiZhāng2012,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After Zhao....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants