New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cxxopts: init at 2.2.1 #110441
cxxopts: init at 2.2.1 #110441
Conversation
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch). Result of 1 package built:
|
I believe I've gotten all the review comments. Let me know if there's anything else. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we enable unicode help by default? Please squash the review commit into the package init commit.
Done. Let me know if you need any more changes. This has been a great learning experience for me. I didn't realize GitHub dealt this well with rebasing. |
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review with nixpkgs-review-checks extension. It is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch). Result of 1 package built:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please change the package init commit to cxxopts: init at 2.2.1
without the v.
Done |
Motivation for this change
cxxopts: init at 2.2.1
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)Running on an M1 mac, so I can't virtualize to test under Linux. However, it's a header-only C++ library, and I've enabled tests so hopefully OfBorg will pick up any issues. Packaging was pretty straightforward.