Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Gecko Bug 1691397] Intrinsic sizes that depend on percentage-sized abspos ancestors should account for containing-block padding correctly. #27779

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 26, 2021

Conversation

moz-wptsync-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Abspos boxes resolve against the pading box, and we were failing to
increase the percentage basis in that case if box-sizing was
content-box.

This is partially the cause of bug 1691374.

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D104389

bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1691397
gecko-commit: 83d93b876225b37ec0a8afd837eeb939fc0e4ae3
gecko-reviewers: layout-reviewers, mats

…ld account for containing-block padding correctly.

Abspos boxes resolve against the pading box, and we were failing to
increase the percentage basis in that case if box-sizing was
content-box.

This is partially the cause of bug 1691374.

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D104389

bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1691397
gecko-commit: 83d93b876225b37ec0a8afd837eeb939fc0e4ae3
gecko-reviewers: layout-reviewers, mats
Copy link
Collaborator

@wpt-pr-bot wpt-pr-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The review process for this patch is being conducted in the Firefox project.

@moz-wptsync-bot moz-wptsync-bot merged commit fef1c09 into master Feb 26, 2021
@moz-wptsync-bot moz-wptsync-bot deleted the gecko/1691397 branch February 26, 2021 04:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants