Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

telegraf: 1.17.0 -> 1.17.2 #111361

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 31, 2021
Merged

telegraf: 1.17.0 -> 1.17.2 #111361

merged 1 commit into from Jan 31, 2021

Conversation

Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Jan 30, 2021 •
edited

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@timstott
Copy link
Contributor

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 111361 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • telegraf

@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 4f5ec15 into NixOS:master Jan 31, 2021
@Mic92 Mic92 deleted the telegraf branch January 31, 2021 12:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@timstott timstott timstott approved these changes

@foxit64 foxit64 Awaiting requested review from foxit64

@kalbasit kalbasit Awaiting requested review from kalbasit

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-darwin: 1 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 11.by: package-maintainer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@Mic92 @timstott