New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perkeep: unstable-2020-03-23 -> 0.11 #111262
perkeep: unstable-2020-03-23 -> 0.11 #111262
Conversation
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <dave@natulte.net>
/marvin opt-in |
Hi! I'm an experimental bot. My goal is to guide this PR through its stages, hopefully ending with a merge. You can read up on the usage here. |
Result of 1 package built:
|
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review with nixpkgs-review-checks extension. It is checked by a human on a best effort basis and does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch). Result of 1 package built:
|
Co-authored-by: Sandro <sandro.jaeckel@gmail.com>
/status needs_merger |
The PR author cannot set the status to If you are not the PR author and you are reading this, please review the usage of this bot. You may be able to help. Please make an honest attempt to resolve all outstanding issues before setting to |
My bad, I saw approval above and got trigger happy. PTAL. |
I would prefer if the commits were squashed or the |
Signed-off-by: David Anderson dave@natulte.net
Motivation for this change
New upstream release.
Things done
Note I trimmed the produced binaries down a little, to just the client and server tools rather than also include the demo and development binaries.
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)