You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@fat-lobyte came across this issue.
In the image below, the manœuvre is not displayed, but there is no error message. The issue may be worked around by increasing the tolerance or number of prediction steps, but nothing suggests that.
Freshness of the prediction of the target is not critical (it is passive except in exotic cases at close range), so there should be no harm in automatically increasing the number of steps requested for that prediction when it is insufficient for the flight plan.
Note that this partially decouples it from the current prediction parameters, which is what is currently used:
@fat-lobyte came across this issue.
In the image below, the manœuvre is not displayed, but there is no error message. The issue may be worked around by increasing the tolerance or number of prediction steps, but nothing suggests that.
Freshness of the prediction of the target is not critical (it is passive except in exotic cases at close range), so there should be no harm in automatically increasing the number of steps requested for that prediction when it is insufficient for the flight plan.
Note that this partially decouples it from the current prediction parameters, which is what is currently used:
Principia/ksp_plugin/plugin.cpp
Lines 879 to 885 in 12d2e88
We may want to make this temporary, instead of mutating the prediction parameters of the target.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: