Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Italicize Latin locutions #2916

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Mar 14, 2021
Merged

Italicize Latin locutions #2916

merged 3 commits into from Mar 14, 2021

Conversation

eggrobin
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ \section*{Definition}
& b_{1} & \cdots & b_{s}
\end{array}
\]
We will only consider \emph{explicit} Runge-Kutta methods, \emph{i.e.}, those where $\matA$ is strictly lower triangular, so that the Butcher tableau is as follows (blank spaces in $\matA$ are zeros).\[
We will only consider \emph{explicit} Runge-Kutta methods, \emph{\idest}, those where $\matA$ is strictly lower triangular, so that the Butcher tableau is as follows (blank spaces in $\matA$ are zeros).\[
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why the \emph?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah yes, that is too many emphs (and they cancel each other out, too).

@pleroy pleroy added the LGTM label Mar 14, 2021
@eggrobin eggrobin merged commit 8b8ea12 into mockingbirdnest:master Mar 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants