Bibliography cleanups #2914
Bibliography cleanups #2914
Conversation
…no ordinary venue
| @@ -1,8 +1,5 @@ | |||
| \documentclass[10pt, a4paper, twoside]{basestyle} | |||
|
|
|||
| \usepackage[backend=biber,firstinits=true,maxnames=100,style=alphabetic,maxalphanames=4,doi=true,isbn=false,url=false,eprint=true]{biblatex} | |||
| \bibliography{bibliography} | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This changes the spacing between the bibliographical id and the bibliographical entry in the References section (previously the entry started roughly below the "n" of "References", now it's below the "e". This less visually pleasant. In particular in this document this leads to a ridiculously overfull hbox when in the [Wes17] reference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was because of the nocite{*} in another refsegment (whose bibliography is not printed) in the same refsection (the margin shifted to accomodate the widest possible label).
This was a way to ensure globally consistent labels with automated disambiguation; now that we have userd we no longer need that.
Note that this means that global uniqueness of the references will be checked only when compiling bibliography (but we should probably make the CI do that anyway).
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are still differences in the way that the URLs get folded in [PL10] and [Wes17] (and the latter is still ugly).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, this is because eprint now starts a line per the global style, and our current settings forbid mid-word linebreaking in a URL. I will try to tame the url options.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Done, there’s a biblatex setting for that (found in https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/134281).
| title = {Repeat Ground Track Lunar Orbits in the Full-Potential Plus Third-Body Problem}, | ||
| volume = {3}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As best I can tell it was nonsense.
Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-located Conferences is unnumbered, so it was not a number (a lot of volumes were « volume within the series » which should go into number in @inproceedings).
AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit (2006) does not appear to be partitioned in volumes either: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/book/10.2514/MAST06.
Note that the previous value of series, Collection of Technical Papers, seems nonsensical.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This came from the citation on ResearchGate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, it looks like in print these proceedings appeared in the three-volume ISBN 1563478226, A collection of technical papers:
- https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/TIBKAT:521489660/A-collection-of-technical-papers-AIAA-AAS-Astrodynamics?cHash=6349bf79113ed67885ab83701e652639;
- https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/TIBKAT:521489873/A-collection-of-technical-papers-AIAA-AAS-Astrodynamics?cHash=cd433c128bcf43589e005c9f781fdb37;
- https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/TIBKAT:521489903/A-collection-of-technical-papers-AIAA-AAS-Astrodynamics?cHash=cb1d3358a90d8b8658ca3bb358e99946.
This print version has page numbers 1935–1954 in that citation, whereas the ARC PDF is numbered 1–20…
If we want to cite the print book we should do the same for the other paper from the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, [Jon12], in https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/TIBKAT:769080677/AIAA-AAS-Astrodynamics-Specialist-Conference-2012?cHash=190c9597dcb0a79c120396334a3fb587—note that for that one the POD publisher is Curran, and the AIAA would need to move from publisher to organization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Added the print metadata to both entries.
This change:
biblatexpackage and its customizations to thebasestyletemplate;basestyletemplate;Fukushima.pdf;labelalphaso that it includes the customuserd(user-defined field,disambiguator) field;userdis factored in, i.e., that the automated disambiguatorextraalphais empty, ensuring stability of labels;userd:.bibID to match if needed, or,.bibIDs otherwise ([Fan91a], [Fan91b]);@incollectionto@inproceedingwhere the collection is specifically conference proceedings;@incollectionto@articlefor [Del90], since that collection is a periodical with an ISSN;eventdateandvenueto all@inproceedingentries, as well as some other fields as appropriate.In order to make diffing easier, this change does not re-alphabetize the entries; this will be done in a subsequent pull request using the usual script.