Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

gleam: 0.8.0 -> 0.8.1 #88973

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

gleam: 0.8.0 -> 0.8.1 #88973

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Br1ght0ne
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

https://github.com/gleam-lang/gleam/releases/tag/v0.8.1

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@danieldk
Copy link
Contributor

Seems like this PR slipped through the cracks. In the meanwhile 0.9.1 is out:

https://github.com/gleam-lang/gleam/releases/tag/v0.9.1

Could you update the PR to 0.9.1? Feel free to ping me for a review once it's bumped.

@risicle
Copy link
Contributor

risicle commented Sep 7, 2020

Superseded.

@risicle risicle closed this Sep 7, 2020
@Br1ght0ne Br1ght0ne deleted the gleam-0.8.1 branch September 9, 2020 07:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-darwin: 1 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 11.by: package-maintainer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@Br1ght0ne @danieldk @risicle