How about we make a maintainer team for these two, and somehow teach repology about maintainer teams?

How about we make a maintainer team for these two, and somehow teach repology about maintainer teams?

That sounds good but I'd still like to see this merged for now and then switched over to that when it's implemented.

@grahamc speaking of teams, could you take a look at #84177 (comment) please?

How about we make a maintainer team for these two, and somehow teach repology about maintainer teams?

@grahamc Could you please clarify if this a blocker?

Reviewing some old "topic: golang" PRs.

It seems like the approach in #84177 is the preferred one? I'd be happy to be part of a Go maintainer team.

It seems like the approach in #84177 is the preferred one?

No, this is works differently. Currently a team is just a pointer to a list of people and not an entity in itself so it isn't useful for repology.

I'd be happy to be part of a Go maintainer team.

I made a team for Golang compliers in #90225, feel free to open a PR to add yourself.

@grahamc Unless there are objections I'll merge this in a week or so, I'd like to see how useful it is (or isn't) before making wider changes.

@zowoq ping, no objections raised so it feels okay to me to move forward with this as a stop gap to gain useful functionality.

@zowoq feel free to add me to the Rust package maintainers, once you add that team.

Reverting this in #93394 as ofborg doesn't seem to be able to handle maintainers that don't have github accounts.

I can't be bothered trying to make changes to ofborg to get this working so I guess this can be considered to be abandoned.