Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pyp: init at 1.0.0 #87605

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

pyp: init at 1.0.0 #87605

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Kha
Copy link
Contributor

@Kha Kha commented May 11, 2020

As featured on Hacker News: run Python one-liners with ease

I took the sources from Github instead of pypi because the latter doesn't include tests, if that makes sense.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
{ lib, fetchFromGitHub, python3Packages, pkgs }:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No pkgs but explicit parameters such as jq and bc.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done, thanks. I felt a bit silly adding dependencies just because of two tests, but as long as they're not in the actual closure that's okay I suppose.

Copy link
Member

@bachp bachp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's working a expected.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 6, 2021

I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jun 6, 2021
@stale stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jun 5, 2022
Copy link
Member

@JohnAZoidberg JohnAZoidberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool tool, tested with:

nix-build -A pyp
ls | ./result/bin/pyp 'x[:3]'

@JohnAZoidberg JohnAZoidberg changed the title pyp: init at 0.2.1 pyp: init at 1.0.0 Jun 5, 2022
@JohnAZoidberg
Copy link
Member

@Kha would you still like to be mentioned as maintainer?

@Kha
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kha commented Jun 5, 2022

Sure, feel free to add yourself as well

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jan 7, 2023
@Janik-Haag
Copy link
Member

@Kha are you still interested in getting this merged?

@stale stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jun 27, 2023
@nagy
Copy link
Member

nagy commented Jul 24, 2023

It looks like this is superseded by #244924 .

@nagy nagy closed this Jul 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants