We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reported by @lpgagnon and @RCrockford.
Bisection shows that the issue is not in Fuchs, it is in Galileo, and it is present at da3e0cd, so it is not introduced by #2604.
@lpgagnon has provided us with a journal, https://drive.google.com/file/d/18vpqxV8rutitvKF7WeUfiTFGXnUOdX8g/view?usp=sharing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Replaying this journal at 2020062107-Galileo-0-g5fa2cecbd475e10034d64b4c4c795bc0003858ec-dirty I am seeing the following quaternion:
2020062107-Galileo-0-g5fa2cecbd475e10034d64b4c4c795bc0003858ec-dirty
0.706907 + 5.66119814470942540e-07 i + 1.25822775266156025e-03 j - 1.67650874336922225e-02 k
the norm of which is +7.07106759520813810e-01, which is not close to 1. The stack is (who would have thought) in Diagonalize:
Diagonalize
@ 000007FEC66E4E3E principia::geometry::internal_rotation::Rotation<principia::geometry::internal_frame::Frame<enum principia::serialization::Frame_PluginTag,2,1,18>,principia::geometry::internal_frame::Frame<enum principia::serialization::Frame_PluginTag,1,1,11> >::Rotatio [0x000007FEC66E4E3D+733] (C:\Users\phl\Projects\GitHub\Principia\Principia\geometry\rotation_body.hpp:97) @ 000007FEC66D9015 principia::geometry::internal_rotation::Rotation<principia::geometry::internal_frame::Frame<enum principia::serialization::Frame_PluginTag,2,1,18>,principia::geometry::internal_frame::Frame<enum principia::serialization::Frame_PluginTag,1,1,11> >::Rotatio [0x000007FEC66D9014+548] (C:\Users\phl\Projects\GitHub\Principia\Principia\geometry\rotation_body.hpp:127) @ 000007FEC66DD7A6 principia::geometry::internal_symmetric_bilinear_form::SymmetricBilinearForm<principia::quantities::internal_quantities::Quantity<principia::quantities::internal_dimensions::Dimensions<2,1,0,0,0,0,0,0> >,principia::geometry::internal_frame::Frame<enum pri [0x000007FEC66DD7A5+1781] (C:\Users\phl\Projects\GitHub\Principia\Principia\geometry\symmetric_bilinear_form_body.hpp:186)
Too late to do numerical analysis, to be continued...
Sorry, something went wrong.
pleroy
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Reported by @lpgagnon and @RCrockford.
Bisection shows that the issue is not in Fuchs, it is in Galileo, and it is present at da3e0cd, so it is not introduced by #2604.
@lpgagnon has provided us with a journal, https://drive.google.com/file/d/18vpqxV8rutitvKF7WeUfiTFGXnUOdX8g/view?usp=sharing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: