Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

terminus: 1.0.0-alpha.42 -> 1.0.106 #85212

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jlesquembre
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

I'm removing myself as maintainer since I don't use terminus anymore.
I also formatted it with nixpkgs-fmt.
I run it locally and looks fine.
Closes #85179

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

I'm removing myself as maintainer since I don't use terminus anymore.
Closes NixOS#85179

wrapProgram $out/bin/terminus \
"''${gappsWrapperArgs[@]}" \
--prefix XDG_DATA_DIRS : "${gtk3}/share/gsettings-schemas/${gtk3.name}/" \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just add gtk3 and glib and this will be added to gappsWrapperArgs automatically as intended

wrapProgram $out/bin/terminus \
"''${gappsWrapperArgs[@]}" \
--prefix XDG_DATA_DIRS : "${gtk3}/share/gsettings-schemas/${gtk3.name}/" \
--prefix LD_LIBRARY_PATH : ${libPath}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this really shouldn't be done at all (we should use rpath like before).
Have you tried using autoPatchelfHook? It patches things automatically and will check if a dependency that is needed is missing in buildInputs.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your help, but with the proposed changes I'm always getting some kind of error. I'm not that familiar with those functions, and my try-and-error approach is not effective. I copied that approach from the discord derivation. Unfortunately, I don't have time to spend on this, feel free to close this PR if it makes sense to you.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Totally understandable if you don't want to spend more time on a package you don't use anymore. I believe you could just leave this open for its new maintainer

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then, let's do that

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 11, 2020

Hello, I'm a bot and I thank you in the name of the community for your contributions.

Nixpkgs is a busy repository, and unfortunately sometimes PRs get left behind for too long. Nevertheless, we'd like to help committers reach the PRs that are still important. This PR has had no activity for 180 days, and so I marked it as stale, but you can rest assured it will never be closed by a non-human.

If this is still important to you and you'd like to remove the stale label, we ask that you leave a comment. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". But there's a bit more you can do:

If you received an approval by an unprivileged maintainer and you are just waiting for a merge, you can @ mention someone with merge permissions and ask them to help. You might be able to find someone relevant by using Git blame on the relevant files, or via GitHub's web interface. You can see if someone's a member of the nixpkgs-committers team, by hovering with the mouse over their username on the web interface, or by searching them directly on the list.

If your PR wasn't reviewed at all, it might help to find someone who's perhaps a user of the package or module you are changing, or alternatively, ask once more for a review by the maintainer of the package/module this is about. If you don't know any, you can use Git blame on the relevant files, or GitHub's web interface to find someone who touched the relevant files in the past.

If your PR has had reviews and nevertheless got stale, make sure you've responded to all of the reviewer's requests / questions. Usually when PR authors show responsibility and dedication, reviewers (privileged or not) show dedication as well. If you've pushed a change, it's possible the reviewer wasn't notified about your push via email, so you can always officially request them for a review, or just @ mention them and say you've addressed their comments.

Lastly, you can always ask for help at our Discourse Forum, or more specifically, at this thread or at #nixos' IRC channel.

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Oct 11, 2020
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 marked this pull request as draft November 27, 2020 21:30
@stale stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Nov 27, 2020
license = licenses.mit;
platforms = [ "x86_64-linux" ];
homepage = "https://eugeny.github.io/terminus/";
maintainers = with maintainers; [];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add yourself back as a maintainer.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Related: #85232
I tried to fix the derivation, but it didn't work. I'm removing myself as maintainer because I don't use terminus anymore, and I don't have time to work on this.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 21, 2021

I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jul 21, 2021
@jlesquembre
Copy link
Member Author

Closing it, since Terminus has been removed: #134974 and at this point, if someone else wants to add it again, makes more sense to start from a fresh PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Terminus is too old
4 participants