New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
deno: 1.0.0 -> 1.0.5 #88681
deno: 1.0.0 -> 1.0.5 #88681
Conversation
07c56fa
to
1b34a8c
Compare
@GrahamcOfBorg build deno |
Hmmm there seems to be a range of different tests failing for the different build targets. I'll do some digging tomorrow |
1f6e30e
to
1b34a8c
Compare
@marsam I'm really not too sure why the tests fail this way. This is the block of code responsible for the most failures: In one of my PRs I'm adding some logging for I like the tests running because it's fun & helps check for f-ups etc but should we turn the checks off for now until we get a handle on this? |
8ccf694
to
f3c44a7
Compare
8c895f7
to
b347752
Compare
I've decided to abandon the tests for now. Once there's more logging in the upstream tests I'll give it another crack. Also added an upgrade script that does most tasks in parallel. |
Dropped tests as they were running inconsistently. Removed python as if the rusty_v8 lib is present no python is ran. Will be happy to add them back in once resolved.
Refactored the structure of the package to be easier to auto update
This'll save time and avoid human error. Wrote in deno typescript because why not.
Also removed python as it's not actually required when we're pre-fetching the |
Thank you for working on this, and sorry for the delay
I think you can add a patch deleting the offending tests |
Motivation for this change
deno
1.0.5
releasedThings done
Bumped version, sha, and cargo sha
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)