Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

nixos/device-tree: fix package name in examples #87517

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 10, 2020
Merged

nixos/device-tree: fix package name in examples #87517

merged 1 commit into from May 10, 2020

Conversation

Gaelan
Copy link
Contributor

@Gaelan Gaelan commented May 10, 2020

Motivation for this change

deviceTree_rpi got renamed to device-tree_rpi a while back, so this updates the examples to reflect that.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@Gaelan
nixos/device-tree: fix package name in examples
adc6771 
deviceTree_rpi got renamed to device-tree_rpi a while back, so this updates the examples to reflect that.
@bjornfor bjornfor merged commit 4ed7e23 into NixOS:master May 10, 2020
@bjornfor
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bjornfor bjornfor bjornfor approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: nixos 8.has: module (update) 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@Gaelan @bjornfor