Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vendor: use nextpnr -12k for -12F devices; remove theoretical devices #361

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 21, 2020
Merged

Conversation

ktemkin
Copy link
Contributor

@ktemkin ktemkin commented Apr 20, 2020

nextpnr now supports -12k; which replaces the use of -25k and --idcode
together to build bitstreams compatible with -12F devices. Use this.

This also removes the LFE5UM-12K and its 5G counterpart; as per Dave Shah
they're currently only theoretical FPGAs.

nextpnr now supports -12k; which replaces the use of -25k and --idcode
together to build bitstreams compatible with -12F devices. Use this.

This also removes the LFEUM-12K and its 5G counterpart; as per Dave Shah
they're currently only theoretical FPGAs.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 21, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #361 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #361   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.55%   82.55%           
=======================================
  Files          35       35           
  Lines        5950     5950           
  Branches     1210     1210           
=======================================
  Hits         4912     4912           
  Misses        871      871           
  Partials      167      167           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ff6c032...58859f8. Read the comment docs.

@whitequark whitequark merged commit 0e18429 into amaranth-lang:master Apr 21, 2020
@whitequark
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants