Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stm32cubemx: 5.3.0 -> 5.6.1 #90254

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

stm32cubemx: 5.3.0 -> 5.6.1 #90254

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dramaturg
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation for this change

Upgrade a package to latest release

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@wucke13
Copy link
Contributor

wucke13 commented Jun 14, 2020

LGTM, but I did not test.

@dramaturg
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM, but I did not test.

@wucke13 I ran it and walked through a small timing setup. No issues with that.

Can you mark the PR as reviewed then?

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/191

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/180

@dramaturg
Copy link
Contributor Author

/marvin opt-in
/status needs_merger

@marvin-mk2
Copy link

marvin-mk2 bot commented Jul 8, 2020

Hi! I'm an experimental bot. My goal is to guide this PR through its stages, hopefully ending with a merge. You can read up on the usage here.

@marvin-mk2 marvin-mk2 bot added the marvin label Jul 8, 2020
@marvin-mk2
Copy link

marvin-mk2 bot commented Jul 8, 2020

The PR author cannot set the status to needs_merger.
Please wait for an external review.
If you are not the PR author and you are reading this, please review the usage of this bot.
You may be able to help.
Please make an honest attempt to resolve all outstanding issues before setting to needs_merger.

@justin-gerhardt
Copy link
Contributor

Why are the manual build steps necessary? The Arch AUR version of this package uses a version derived url from ST.
I've created my own version of the update using that url and everything seems to work fine.
2370ca0

@dramaturg
Copy link
Contributor Author

My best guess is @wucke13 did it this way because when downloading this you have to accept a license agreement.
Some nix packages require a license agreement flag to be set - could we do the same here?

@justin-gerhardt
Copy link
Contributor

The license provided with the zip does generally permit redistribution, so ST is presumably fine with people not going though the license/auth flow. My guess would be @wucke13 wasn't aware the package could be downloaded without signing in and therefore made the process manual.

@wucke13
Copy link
Contributor

wucke13 commented Jul 18, 2020

@justin-gerhardt Exactly, I wasn't aware. Would you like to make a PR with your changes? It sounds promising not having to download stuff manually.

@justin-gerhardt justin-gerhardt mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2020
10 tasks
@infinisil infinisil closed this Aug 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants