-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pythonPackages.manticore: init at 0.3.5 #85810
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for opening your first PR! :)
Some comments (please try to apply to relevant packages):
Please create a commit per package addition, to follow CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines
There are no tests included. Please try to checkout from source and check if they have unit tests, and try to run them. Unit tests give a good indication that they package has a high degree of validity and correctness given the python package set.
If tests are not available, then please use pythonImportsCheck
to import the most important modules. This isn't as good as unit tests, but will usually give a good indication of run-time errors.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 0 tests in 0.000s
a447ee7
to
eadaf06
Compare
@jonringer thank you for the review, I've learned a few things. I hope all the issues are addressed now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Big issue is repeat of z3 package.
Also, commits should be squashed before merge, one commit per package init. FWIW, |
Please follow CONTRIBUTING.md and manual#submitting-changes-making-patches and squash the commits. Since your commits are quite complex, i would recommend using |
9e70bf2
to
e75f082
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Diff mostly LGTM. All comments here are woodshedding.
- Commits LGTM
- Builds via
nix-review
. Takes about 5 mins, incl. testing 👍 ✔️
, buildPythonPackage | ||
, fetchPypi | ||
, pysha3 | ||
, pythonOlder |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be moved below fetchPypi
909a689
to
b121916
Compare
@jonringer is there anything still missing here? |
Result of 8 packages built:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
otherwise LGTM
@ofborg eval |
Result of 9 packages built:
|
Result of 9 packages built:
|
@arcz Can you fix the license and the merge conflict? |
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: |
Result of 9 packages built:
|
please resolve conflicts |
This is a semi-automatic executed nixpkgs-review which does not build all packages (e.g. lumo, tensorflow or pytorch) Result of 9 packages built:
|
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS linux)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)