Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

imagemagick: 6.9.10-71 -> 6.9.11-14, 7.0.9-0 -> 7.0.10-14 #88041

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 29, 2020
Merged

imagemagick: 6.9.10-71 -> 6.9.11-14, 7.0.9-0 -> 7.0.10-14 #88041

merged 2 commits into from May 29, 2020

Conversation

zowoq
Copy link
Contributor

@zowoq zowoq commented May 18, 2020

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@zowoq zowoq changed the base branch from staging to master May 22, 2020 00:42
@zowoq zowoq changed the title imagemagick: 6.9.10-71 -> 6.9.11-12, 7.0.9-0 -> 7.0.10-13 imagemagick: 6.9.10-71 -> 6.9.11-14, 7.0.9-0 -> 7.0.10-14 May 24, 2020
@marsam marsam merged commit b6b424b into NixOS:master May 29, 2020
@zowoq zowoq deleted the imagemagick branch May 29, 2020 05:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100 10.rebuild-linux: 101-500
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@zowoq @marsam