Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

unrpa: init at 2.3.0 #87677

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 13, 2020
Merged

unrpa: init at 2.3.0 #87677

merged 2 commits into from
May 13, 2020
+28 −0

Conversation

leo60228
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

I wanted to use it.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • N/A: Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • N/A: Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • N/A: Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@leo60228 leo60228 requested review from FRidh and jonringer as code owners May 12, 2020 16:23
@ofborg ofborg bot added 6.topic: python 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels May 12, 2020
jonringer
jonringer reviewed May 12, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@jonringer jonringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no tests included. Please try to checkout from source and check if they have unit tests, and try to run them. Unit tests give a good indication that they package has a high degree of validity and correctness given the python package set.

If tests are not available, then please use pythonImportsCheck to import the most important modules. This isn't as good as unit tests, but will usually give a good indication of run-time errors.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 0 tests in 0.000s

jonringer
jonringer reviewed May 12, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@jonringer jonringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, commit message should be the install-path: message, so:

pythonPackages.unrpa: init at 2.3.0

@leo60228
Copy link
Member Author

Also, commit message should be the install-path: message, so:

Is this documented anywhere? CONTRIBUTING.md says it should be pkg-name.

@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

Is this documented anywhere? CONTRIBUTING.md says it should be pkg-name.

If it was a top-level attribute, these two things are the same. However, this exists on the python package set, which is slightly different.

I agree that the wording isn't super explicit about what this means

@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

Reading about the package, it seems that we are more interested in the executable, rather than being able to import it as a library. So we should be using buildPythonApplication, please read https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/doc/languages-frameworks/python.section.md#buildpythonapplication-function for more details on packaging python applications with nix :)

@leo60228
Copy link
Member Author

As using it as a library is a supported usecase, should toPythonApplication not be used instead? This is similar to youtube-dl (where usage as an application is much more common), which is the example for toPythonApplication.

@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

yea, that seems good

jonringer
jonringer approved these changes May 13, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@jonringer jonringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 87677 1

2 packages built: - unrpa (python37Packages.unrpa) - python38Packages.unrpa

@jonringer jonringer merged commit 53c48c2 into NixOS:master May 13, 2020
leo60228 added a commit to leo60228/unrpa that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
@leo60228
Mention community-maintained packages
d6c2ba0 
I've added a NixOS package in NixOS/nixpkgs#87677. After some looking, the only other distro I could find with a package was Gentoo.
@leo60228 leo60228 mentioned this pull request May 13, 2020
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jonringer jonringer

@FRidh FRidh

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: python 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@leo60228 @jonringer