Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.17, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.4.0, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.22 #76911

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Mar 13, 2020
Merged

raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.17, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.4.0, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.22 #76911

merged 3 commits into from Mar 13, 2020

Conversation

wucke13
Copy link
Contributor

@wucke13 wucke13 commented Jan 4, 2020 •
edited

Motivation for this change

Update.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

@wucke13
Copy link
Contributor Author

wucke13 commented Jan 4, 2020

@GrahamcOfBorg build raft-canonical

@wucke13
Copy link
Contributor Author

wucke13 commented Jan 4, 2020

@GrahamcOfBorg build lxd dqlite raft-canonical

@wucke13 wucke13 changed the title raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.15 raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.15, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.2.2 Jan 4, 2020
@wucke13
Copy link
Contributor Author

wucke13 commented Jan 4, 2020

@GrahamcOfBorg build dqlite
@GrahamcOfBorg build raft-canonical

@wucke13 wucke13 changed the title raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.15, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.2.2 [WIP] raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.15, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.2.2 Jan 4, 2020
@wucke13
Copy link
Contributor Author

wucke13 commented Jan 4, 2020

@GrahamcOfBorg lxd

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from jokogr January 4, 2020 01:09
@FRidh
Copy link
Member

FRidh commented Feb 10, 2020

What's the status? I see ofborg reported a failure.

@wucke13
Copy link
Contributor Author

wucke13 commented Feb 12, 2020 •
edited

@GrahamcOfBorg build raft-canonical dqlite lxd
@FRidh Probably finished. The only thing that bites me a bit is disabling the tests in raft-canonical. Suggestions welcome!

@wucke13 wucke13 changed the title [WIP] raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.15, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.2.2 raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.15, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.2.2, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.20 Feb 12, 2020
@ofborg ofborg bot requested review from fpletz and ehmry February 12, 2020 01:45
@wucke13 wucke13 changed the title raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.15, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.2.2, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.20 raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.15, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.2.2, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.21 Feb 20, 2020
@wucke13
Copy link
Contributor Author

wucke13 commented Feb 20, 2020

@GrahamcOfBorg build raft-canonical dqlite lxd

@wucke13 wucke13 changed the title raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.15, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.2.2, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.21 raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.17, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.2.2, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.21 Mar 13, 2020
@wucke13 wucke13 changed the title raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.17, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.2.2, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.21 raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.17, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.4.0, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.21 Mar 13, 2020
@wucke13 wucke13 changed the title raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.17, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.4.0, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.21 raft-canonical: 0.9.6 -> 0.9.17, dqlite: 1.0.0 -> 1.4.0, lxd: 3.18 -> 3.22 Mar 13, 2020
@wucke13
Copy link
Contributor Author

wucke13 commented Mar 13, 2020

@GrahamcOfBorg build lxd

@marsam marsam merged commit cc1f45b into NixOS:master Mar 13, 2020
@marsam
Copy link
Contributor

marsam commented Mar 13, 2020

@wucke13 thank you for working on this, please ping me if a PR gets stuck

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@marsam marsam marsam left review comments

@jokogr jokogr Awaiting requested review from jokogr

@fpletz fpletz Awaiting requested review from fpletz

@ehmry ehmry Awaiting requested review from ehmry

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 11.by: package-maintainer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@wucke13 @FRidh @marsam