Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

smu: init at 1.5 #73517

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 17, 2019
Merged

smu: init at 1.5 #73517

merged 1 commit into from Nov 17, 2019

Conversation

oxzi
Copy link
Member

@oxzi oxzi commented Nov 16, 2019

Motivation for this change

This PR adds smu as a package.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

Copy link
Contributor

@jonringer jonringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nix-review passes on NixOS
diff LGTM
commits LGTM
outputs LGTM
repo looks.... somewhat active
executable shows usage

[3 built, 0.0 MiB DL]
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/73517
1 package were build:
smu
[nix-shell:~/.cache/nix-review/pr-73517]$ nix path-info -Sh ./results/smu
/nix/store/cpgz4fc1pvpkchklkk1vnx6vigsfcxmg-smu   26.9M

@jonringer
Copy link
Contributor

@GrahamcOfBorg build smu

@markuskowa markuskowa merged commit 6f4e522 into NixOS:master Nov 17, 2019
@oxzi oxzi deleted the smu branch November 20, 2019 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants