Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

jackett: 0.11.687 -> 0.11.751 #70079

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2019
Merged

jackett: 0.11.687 -> 0.11.751 #70079

merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2019

Conversation

Vskilet
Copy link
Contributor

@Vskilet Vskilet commented Sep 30, 2019 •
edited

Motivation for this change

Latest stable release of jackett.
Fix ygg and others.

I use this version on my server.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @edwtjo @nyanloutre

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from edwtjo September 30, 2019 19:07
@etu
Copy link
Contributor

etu commented Oct 1, 2019

@GrahamcOfBorg test jackett

@etu etu merged commit 65c433b into NixOS:master Oct 1, 2019
@Vskilet Vskilet deleted the jackett-update branch May 1, 2020 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@edwtjo edwtjo Awaiting requested review from edwtjo

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@Vskilet @etu