Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cargo-audit: init at 0.9.1 #70180

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2019
Merged

cargo-audit: init at 0.9.1 #70180

merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2019

Conversation

basvandijk
Copy link
Member

cargo-audit is a subcommand for cargo which audits Cargo.lock files for crates with security vulnerabilities

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

cargo-audit is a subcommand for cargo which audits Cargo.lock files for crates
with security vulnerabilities
@basvandijk
Copy link
Member Author

@GrahamcOfBorg build cargo-audit

@Ma27
Copy link
Member

Ma27 commented Oct 1, 2019

Built locally on a x86_64-linux, so this should be fine 👍

@Ma27 Ma27 merged commit 16e3408 into NixOS:master Oct 1, 2019
dtzWill pushed a commit to dtzWill/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2019
cargo-audit: init at 0.9.1
(cherry picked from commit 16e3408)
ivan pushed a commit to ivan/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2019
cargo-audit: init at 0.9.1

(cherry picked from commit 16e3408)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants