Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sourcetrail: 2019.3.46 -> 2019.4.1 #73974

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Br1ght0ne
Copy link
Member

@Br1ght0ne Br1ght0ne commented Nov 23, 2019

Motivation for this change

Sourcetrail is now open source (GPL-3).

  • src: fetchurl -> fetchFromGitHub
  • remove installPhase
  • change meta
    • platforms: x86_64-linux -> all
    • license: unfree -> gpl3
    • maintainers: add filalex77
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @midchildan


This change is Reviewable

@Br1ght0ne
Copy link
Member Author

@GrahamcOfBorg build sourcetrail

Copy link
Contributor

@jtojnar jtojnar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at https://logs.nix.ci/?key=nixos/nixpkgs.73974&attempt_id=dd019a46-5ed0-4b3d-aa0c-dfdd958a4a3d

You are missing some dependencies:

linux_package.cmake just proves my point about no one understanding CMake. Build manager simply is not meant for installing dependencies. They should use find_package for Qt and let it find all its dependencies as well.

NIX_LDFLAGS = [ "-lrt" ]; might help for the undefined shm_open if this is correct. Or apply this patch CoatiSoftware/Sourcetrail#784

pkgs/development/tools/sourcetrail/default.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
runHook postInstall
'';
nativeBuildInputs = [ boost168 cmake qt512.qtbase qt512.qtsvg ];
buildInputs = [ dbus expat git openssl python3 zlib ];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
buildInputs = [ dbus expat git openssl python3 zlib ];
buildInputs = [ boost168 qt512.qtbase qt512.qtsvg dbus expat git openssl python3 zlib ];

Is git needed at runtime? I doubt it will get picked up from here.
Are specific versions of boost and Qt needed? If so, there should be a comment with explanation. Though more generic versions are preferred whenever possible.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then it is likely executed at build time and should go to nativeBuildInputs. Though note that fetchFromGitHub strips the .git directory so git will not be of any help.

# XXX: Sourcetrail somehow copies the initial config files into the home
# directory without write permissions. We currently just copy them
# ourselves to work around this problem.
setup_config() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this no longer a problem?


substituteInPlace \
$out/share/applications/sourcetrail.desktop \
--replace /usr/bin/ $out/bin/
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this no longer a problem?

Sourcetrail is now open source (GPL-3).

- src: fetchurl -> fetchFromGitHub
- remove installPhase
- change meta
  - platforms: x86_64-linux -> all
  - license: unfree -> gpl3
  - maintainers: add filalex77
@Br1ght0ne
Copy link
Member Author

@GrahamcOfBorg build sourcetrail

@Moredread
Copy link
Contributor

Did you make progress in the meantime?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 1, 2020

Hello, I'm a bot and I thank you in the name of the community for your contributions.

Nixpkgs is a busy repository, and unfortunately sometimes PRs get left behind for too long. Nevertheless, we'd like to help committers reach the PRs that are still important. This PR has had no activity for 180 days, and so I marked it as stale, but you can rest assured it will never be closed by a non-human.

If this is still important to you and you'd like to remove the stale label, we ask that you leave a comment. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". But there's a bit more you can do:

If you received an approval by an unprivileged maintainer and you are just waiting for a merge, you can @ mention someone with merge permissions and ask them to help. You might be able to find someone relevant by using Git blame on the relevant files, or via GitHub's web interface. You can see if someone's a member of the nixpkgs-committers team, by hovering with the mouse over their username on the web interface, or by searching them directly on the list.

If your PR wasn't reviewed at all, it might help to find someone who's perhaps a user of the package or module you are changing, or alternatively, ask once more for a review by the maintainer of the package/module this is about. If you don't know any, you can use Git blame on the relevant files, or GitHub's web interface to find someone who touched the relevant files in the past.

If your PR has had reviews and nevertheless got stale, make sure you've responded to all of the reviewer's requests / questions. Usually when PR authors show responsibility and dedication, reviewers (privileged or not) show dedication as well. If you've pushed a change, it's possible the reviewer wasn't notified about your push via email, so you can always officially request them for a review, or just @ mention them and say you've addressed their comments.

Lastly, you can always ask for help at our Discourse Forum, or more specifically, at this thread or at #nixos' IRC channel.

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Aug 1, 2020
@stale stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jan 18, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 19, 2021

I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jul 19, 2021
@Br1ght0ne
Copy link
Member Author

Closing because of #95530.

@Br1ght0ne Br1ght0ne closed this Jul 20, 2021
@Br1ght0ne Br1ght0ne deleted the sourcetrail-2019.4.61 branch July 20, 2021 12:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants