Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

diffoscope: 129 -> 131 #74022

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2019
Merged

diffoscope: 129 -> 131 #74022

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2019

Conversation

raboof
Copy link
Member

@raboof raboof commented Nov 24, 2019

Motivation for this change

Update tot version 131

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @dezgeg

Sorry, something went wrong.

@FRidh FRidh merged commit e4f551a into NixOS:master Nov 24, 2019
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from dezgeg November 24, 2019 09:44
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Nov 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dezgeg dezgeg

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@raboof @FRidh