Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

udev: fix option description #76514

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 26, 2019
Merged

udev: fix option description #76514

merged 1 commit into from Dec 26, 2019

Conversation

Thra11
Copy link
Member

@Thra11 Thra11 commented Dec 25, 2019

The two file paths were changed from 10-local to 99-local, but only one
of the descriptions was changed.

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

@Thra11
udev: fix option description
08d31b7 
The two file paths were changed from 10-local to 99-local, but only one
of the descriptions was changed.
@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit c5aacb2 into NixOS:master Dec 26, 2019
@Thra11 Thra11 deleted the fix-udev-hwdb-description branch December 26, 2019 12:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: nixos 8.has: module (update) 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@Thra11 @Mic92