Haskell updates #69886
Haskell updates #69886
Conversation
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.15.0 from Hackage revision commercialhaskell/all-cabal-hashes@43ab240.
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.15.0 from Hackage revision commercialhaskell/all-cabal-hashes@05d7197.
Without this change, the build fails with:
```
Warning:
This package indirectly depends on multiple versions of the same package. This is very likely to cause a compile failure.
package hackage-db (hackage-db-2.0.1-AliTRXEJBGFAEMpONOEnbV) requires Cabal-2.4.0.1
package hpack (hpack-0.32.0-1iJuukTWmC4EGkYhAiFeII) requires Cabal-3.0.0.0-CD1INMNwoxXIKVgcu1nec5
package distribution-nixpkgs (distribution-nixpkgs-1.3.1-82Z2DCdLAUs8Q2gjtlPLz5) requires Cabal-3.0.0.0-CD1INMNwoxXIKVgcu1nec5
package cabal2nix (cabal2nix-2.15.0) requires Cabal-3.0.0.0-CD1INMNwoxXIKVgcu1nec5
package cabal2nix (cabal2nix-2.15.0) requires Cabal-3.0.0.0-CD1INMNwoxXIKVgcu1nec5
package cabal2nix (cabal2nix-2.15.0) requires Cabal-3.0.0.0-CD1INMNwoxXIKVgcu1nec5
```
cabal2nix: fix build
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.15.0 from Hackage revision commercialhaskell/all-cabal-hashes@47b2f92.
`niv` used to depend on the broken `github`. The dependency was removed and `niv` builds fine.
GHCJS: Build on Hydra
niv: mark as not broken
|
@GrahamcOfBorg build cachix niv cabal2nix |
|
@GrahamcOfBorg eval |
|
Sure, I'd like to understand what's missing and help out. I should have opened a draft PR, but too late :) |
ofborg
bot
added
8.has: package (new)
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.15.0 from Hackage revision commercialhaskell/all-cabal-hashes@04348dc.
|
@GrahamcOfBorg build cachix niv cabal2nix |
|
@peti https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1545587 looks good |
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.15.0-1-g5325ccd from Hackage revision commercialhaskell/all-cabal-hashes@4897232.
|
@peti what's left? |
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.15.0-1-g5325ccd from Hackage revision commercialhaskell/all-cabal-hashes@36c2589.
Haddock is currently broken. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We need a working haddock, I suppose: https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1546016
|
OK. I'm going to make another release of cachix and we can merge this tomorrow. |
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.15.0-1-g5325ccd from Hackage revision commercialhaskell/all-cabal-hashes@c3176c0.
|
Released, if you update the set we can fix haddock and merge. |
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.15.0-1-g5325ccd from Hackage revision commercialhaskell/all-cabal-hashes@b51789e.
This should fix it I guess + an override. |
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.15.0-1-g5325ccd from Hackage revision commercialhaskell/all-cabal-hashes@845035f.
|
@peti does the above patch look good? |
Yes, it looks good to me. I'm not sure whether other haddock packages will build properly with a version of |
|
@peti cool, if you can regenerate the packages I'll verify they build and we can merge. |
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.15.0-1-g5325ccd from Hackage revision commercialhaskell/all-cabal-hashes@54d61d7.
Done. In case you are not aware of the video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qX0mgtSm360 might be of interest. |
It seems to work again. Going to merge after CI passes the evaluation checks. |
|
I would not have merged the branch in this state. I would have liked to do more clean-up first. 😞 |
|
I really wanted nixpkgs master fixed, seems like the cleanup can be done on top of this work? :) |
|
Well, if you don't want to take my interests seriously, then I guess I'll just file that under "experience". |
|
@peti I've asked you (multiple times) in this PR:
You approved the PR, then said we have to fix haddock. I've shown you the diff I applied (which I simplified). So I'm quite certain I did my best to give you a chance to communicate what you'd like to do. |
|
That said, thanks for the video, I'll watch it. |
No description provided.