Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nix-prefetch-docker: handle overrides correctly #73120

Closed

Conversation

robin-engineml
Copy link
Contributor

@robin-engineml robin-engineml commented Nov 9, 2019

Without this change, the --os and --arch switches are disregarded
for operations involving skopeo inspect invocations. This means that,
for example, one cannot fetch Linux images while on macOS.

Motivation for this change

Correct oversight on nix-prefetch-docker script.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

@grahamc or @lethalman are you maintainers? Not sure how to correctly identify maintainers of this code. And I have more PRs to submit.

Without this change, the `--os` and `--arch` switches are disregarded
for operations involving `skopeo inspect` invocations. This means that,
for example, one cannot fetch Linux images while on macOS.
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 1, 2020

Thank you for your contributions.
This has been automatically marked as stale because it has had no activity for 180 days.
If this is still important to you, we ask that you leave a comment below. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". This lets people see that at least one person still cares about this. Someone will have to do this at most twice a year if there is no other activity.
Here are suggestions that might help resolve this more quickly:

  1. Search for maintainers and people that previously touched the
    related code and @ mention them in a comment.
  2. Ask on the NixOS Discourse. 3. Ask on the #nixos channel on
    irc.freenode.net.

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jun 1, 2020
@infinisil
Copy link
Member

Looking good! Can you fix the merge conflict so I can merge it?

@stale stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Aug 22, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 4, 2021

I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jun 4, 2021
@Artturin
Copy link
Member

Artturin commented Apr 3, 2023

#224503

@Artturin Artturin closed this Apr 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants