Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pifs: add #71504

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

pifs: add #71504

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chessai
Copy link
Member

@chessai chessai commented Oct 21, 2019

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @chessai

Sorry, something went wrong.

src = fetchFromGitHub {
owner = "philipl";
repo = "pifs";
rev = "3d9cc9db6a01234833c3d77c0846e20485763639";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So it's not version 1.0

@ofborg ofborg bot added 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Oct 21, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@c0bw3b c0bw3b left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commit message doesn't follow nixpkgs guidelines.

More importantly, this package is a better candidate for NUR rather than nixpkgs

@chessai
Copy link
Member Author

chessai commented Oct 21, 2019

Commit message doesn't follow nixpkgs guidelines.

More importantly, this package is a better candidate for NUR rather than nixpkgs

That point about NUR is accurate. I will close this then.

@chessai chessai closed this Oct 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants