Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set of redwax modules (modular/federated PKI tooling) #75619

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Set of redwax modules (modular/federated PKI tooling) #75619

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Dec 13, 2019

Motivation for this change

Set of apache modules that make up most of a PKI framework; along with things like SCEP (automated rollout to things like cisco routers, iPhones, etc), timestamping and so on.

Note that this is our first attempt at a NixOS module set - any and all comments welcome; e.g. should we do it 1) like this - fairly independent; 2) create a library with just the sha/name/desc per module file or 3) create the common elements in the mother module (mod_ca) and minimise the leaf modules by referring somehow to the mod_ca definitions ?

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • [x ] NixOS
    • [x ] macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • [x ] Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • [x ] Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

@ghost ghost closed this Dec 13, 2019
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Dec 13, 2019

Done pull request from the wrong account. Canceling.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant