Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add licenseCheckPredicate for arbitrary license checks #72079

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

graham33
Copy link
Contributor

@graham33 graham33 commented Oct 27, 2019

Motivation for this change

This can be used to implement custom whitelisting and blacklisting,
e.g. to allow exceptions for certain packages.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

This can be used to implement custom whitelisting and blacklisting,
e.g. to allow exceptions for certain packages.
@@ -230,6 +231,8 @@ let
{ valid = false; reason = "unfree"; errormsg = "has an unfree license (‘${showLicense attrs.meta.license}’)"; }
else if hasBlacklistedLicense attrs then
{ valid = false; reason = "blacklisted"; errormsg = "has a blacklisted license (‘${showLicense attrs.meta.license}’)"; }
else if hasLicense attrs && !(licenseCheckPredicate attrs) then
{ valid = false; reason = "blacklisted"; errormsg = "failed licenseCheckPredicate (‘${showLicense attrs.meta.license}’)"; }
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I decided to reuse the "blacklisted" reason string here because I wasn't sure if something else handles these strings elsewhere. Alternatively we could have a new one like "license-check-failed" or something.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 1, 2020

Thank you for your contributions.
This has been automatically marked as stale because it has had no activity for 180 days.
If this is still important to you, we ask that you leave a comment below. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". This lets people see that at least one person still cares about this. Someone will have to do this at most twice a year if there is no other activity.
Here are suggestions that might help resolve this more quickly:

  1. Search for maintainers and people that previously touched the
    related code and @ mention them in a comment.
  2. Ask on the NixOS Discourse. 3. Ask on the #nixos channel on
    irc.freenode.net.

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jun 1, 2020
@stale stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Oct 3, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 7, 2021

I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Apr 7, 2021
@graham33 graham33 marked this pull request as draft September 9, 2023 14:51
@stale stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Sep 9, 2023
@wegank wegank added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants