Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Litex pending PRs #1198

Closed
5 of 8 tasks
acomodi opened this issue Dec 4, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
5 of 8 tasks

Litex pending PRs #1198

acomodi opened this issue Dec 4, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@acomodi
Copy link
Contributor

acomodi commented Dec 4, 2019 •
edited by tmichalak

This issue collects all the pending PRs needed to build the full LiteX design.

Necessary

These are the necessary PRs, critical for having a working HW implementation of the design:

PR not yet open

These is a collection of issues that still do not have an open PR:

  • Support for various IOSTANDARDs and for IN_TERM and SLEW settings

Not necessary

These are not necessary PRs, they do not directly impact the LiteX design build outcome:
@litghost
Copy link
Contributor

litghost commented Dec 4, 2019 •
edited

Status's as of 12/4:

@litghost
Copy link
Contributor

litghost commented Dec 9, 2019 •
edited

Status as of 12/9:

  • Mini Litex test (minimal version of the full LiteX design: Mini Litex test #1181
    • Working on hardware, but needs LOC constraints to prevent BUFG and PLL from being placed in invalid locations.
  • HCLK_IOI support (for the IDELAYCTRL): Add BUFR support #1191
    • PR was split. New PR is required to finish IDELAYCTRL support, as diff_fasm tests were failing and are currently disabled.

@acomodi
Copy link
Contributor Author

acomodi commented Dec 8, 2020

This issue has been solved and LiteX is enabledand supported. Closing.

@acomodi acomodi closed this as completed Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@litghost @acomodi