Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

wireguard-tools: 0.0.20190913 -> 0.0.20191012 #71364

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2019
Merged

wireguard-tools: 0.0.20190913 -> 0.0.20191012 #71364

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2019
+3 −3

Conversation

Ma27
Copy link
Member

@Ma27 Ma27 commented Oct 18, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Motivation for this change

https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2019-October/004594.html

Also decided to add myself to the maintainers list as I use WireGuard
pretty heavily for private/work-related stuff and I intend to help taking care
of the WireGuard ecosystem in NixOS as well.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

Sorry, something went wrong.

@Ma27
wireguard-tools: 0.0.20190913 -> 0.0.20191012
2177639 
https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2019-October/004594.html

Also decided to add myself to the maintainers list as I use WireGuard
pretty heavily for private/work-related stuff and I intend to help taking care
of the WireGuard ecosystem in NixOS as well.
@Ma27 Ma27 requested review from fpletz, dtzWill, elseym and globin October 18, 2019 21:54
@Ma27
Copy link
Member Author

Ma27 commented Oct 18, 2019

@ofborg test wireguard wireguard-generated

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from Mic92 October 18, 2019 22:08
@ofborg ofborg bot added 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 labels Oct 18, 2019
@globin globin merged commit 781e2ba into NixOS:master Oct 22, 2019
@Ma27 Ma27 deleted the bump-wireguard branch October 22, 2019 11:21
@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Oct 23, 2019

We usually also backport wireguard to stable, since it is still experimental.

@Ma27
Copy link
Member Author

Ma27 commented Oct 23, 2019

Do you want to do this? Otherwise I could do the backport tonight :)

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Oct 23, 2019

I am also in the office right now.

@Ma27
Copy link
Member Author

Ma27 commented Oct 23, 2019

Backported as 4ddaf40.

@Ma27 Ma27 added the 8.has: port to stable A PR already has a backport to the stable release. label Oct 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@fpletz fpletz

@dtzWill dtzWill

@elseym elseym

@globin globin

@Mic92 Mic92

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
8.has: port to stable A PR already has a backport to the stable release. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@Ma27 @Mic92 @globin