Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wireguard-tools: 0.0.20190913 -> 0.0.20191012 #71364

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 22, 2019
Merged

Conversation

Ma27
Copy link
Member

@Ma27 Ma27 commented Oct 18, 2019

Motivation for this change

https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2019-October/004594.html

Also decided to add myself to the maintainers list as I use WireGuard
pretty heavily for private/work-related stuff and I intend to help taking care
of the WireGuard ecosystem in NixOS as well.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2019-October/004594.html

Also decided to add myself to the maintainers list as I use WireGuard
pretty heavily for private/work-related stuff and I intend to help taking care
of the WireGuard ecosystem in NixOS as well.
@Ma27
Copy link
Member Author

Ma27 commented Oct 18, 2019

@ofborg test wireguard wireguard-generated

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Oct 23, 2019

We usually also backport wireguard to stable, since it is still experimental.

@Ma27
Copy link
Member Author

Ma27 commented Oct 23, 2019

Do you want to do this? Otherwise I could do the backport tonight :)

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Oct 23, 2019

I am also in the office right now.

@Ma27
Copy link
Member Author

Ma27 commented Oct 23, 2019

Backported as 4ddaf40.

@Ma27 Ma27 added the 8.has: port to stable A PR already has a backport to the stable release. label Oct 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants