You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why did we need this? (what does this change enable us to do)
This enables the specification of place constraints of non-IO tiles, necessary to solve issues like f4pga/f4pga-arch-defs#1182
What did it change?
initial placement of fixed IOs
Should it be merged upstream - if not, when can we delete it?
No, this is a temporary solution. The issue should be solved in a more proper way, but it requires consultations with vtr-devs to get to the final solution.
What is needed to get this merged / deleted?
Update VtR with an alternative solution, (e.g. enable usage of placer constraint files).
is the implementation work to make suitable for merging / deletion completed?
Is there an associated test?
is this currently part of the Conda package?
is this properly cleaned up in our local repositories?
Why did we need this? (what does this change enable us to do)
This enables the specification of place constraints of non-IO tiles, necessary to solve issues like f4pga/f4pga-arch-defs#1182
What did it change?
initial placement of fixed IOs
Should it be merged upstream - if not, when can we delete it?
No, this is a temporary solution. The issue should be solved in a more proper way, but it requires consultations with vtr-devs to get to the final solution.
What is needed to get this merged / deleted?
Update VtR with an alternative solution, (e.g. enable usage of placer constraint files).
Tracker / branch / PR & other useful links
f4pga/f4pga-arch-defs#1182
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: