Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

nodejs-12_x: 12.10.0 -> 12.12.0 #71185

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2019
Merged

nodejs-12_x: 12.10.0 -> 12.12.0 #71185

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2019
+2 −2

Conversation

marsam
Copy link
Contributor

@marsam marsam commented Oct 15, 2019

Motivation for this change

supersedes and closes #70253

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

Sorry, something went wrong.

@marsam marsam merged commit b425412 into NixOS:master Oct 15, 2019
@marsam marsam deleted the update-nodejs-12_x branch October 15, 2019 18:29
@Ma27
Copy link
Member

Ma27 commented Oct 15, 2019

@marsam should we backport this to release-19.09?

@marsam
Copy link
Contributor Author

marsam commented Oct 15, 2019

I don't think so, it does not have neither regressions nor security fixes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@marsam @Ma27