Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

scalapack: 2.0.2 -> 2.1 #73835

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 22, 2019
Merged

scalapack: 2.0.2 -> 2.1 #73835

merged 1 commit into from Nov 22, 2019

Conversation

markuskowa
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

http://netlib.org/scalapack/scalapack-2.1.html

Things done
  • Removed openmpi-4 patch
  • Switched sources to GitHub
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @costrouc

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from costrouc November 20, 2019 22:20
@d-goldin
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm

@markuskowa markuskowa merged commit 0d2fd90 into NixOS:master Nov 22, 2019
@markuskowa markuskowa deleted the upd-scalapack branch November 22, 2019 21:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@costrouc costrouc Awaiting requested review from costrouc

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 11.by: package-maintainer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@markuskowa @d-goldin