Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

treewide: fix cargoSha256 (again) #76060

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Dec 20, 2019
Merged

Conversation

alyssais
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

Previously: #62047

This time the change in cargo vendor output was caused by a4fc84d.

I hope that some time soon we can ban buildRustPackage from Nixpkgs.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

cargo-vendor output was changed in a4fc84d.
cargo-vendor output was changed in a4fc84d.
cargo-vendor output was changed in a4fc84d.
@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Dec 19, 2019

carnix is worse at the moment due the large amounts of nix expressions it generates. There is no alternative atm.

cargo-vendor output was changed in a4fc84d.
cargo-vendor output was changed in a4fc84d.
cargo-vendor output was changed in a4fc84d.
cargo-vendor output was changed in a4fc84d.
@alyssais alyssais merged commit 7887a81 into NixOS:master Dec 20, 2019
@alyssais alyssais deleted the cargo-vendor branch December 20, 2019 20:09
@lilyball
Copy link
Member

Why did the rustc update cause cargo vendor output to change though? What's the root cause here?

@lilyball
Copy link
Member

I'm also curious why this change didn't affect all rust packages. For example, it doesn't look as though exa broke with the update.

@alyssais
Copy link
Member Author

alyssais commented Dec 22, 2019 via email

@lilyball
Copy link
Member

Wow really? That seems really odd, because I thought Cargo.lock was intentionally and explicitly excluded from dependencies.

@alyssais
Copy link
Member Author

alyssais commented Dec 22, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants